A guide to systematic literature reviews

References 

1. Lau J, Antman EM, Jimenez-Silva J, et al. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:248–254
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
2. Antman EM, Lau J, Kuplenick B, et al. A comparison of results of meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992;268:240–248
   • MEDLINE
3. Cochrane Collaboration website www.cochrane.org(Accessed 15/07/09)
4. Gillies D, Maxwell H, New K, et al. A collaboration-wide survey of Cochrane authors. Available from the Cochrane Library www.cochrane.org/resources/author_survey_report_2009.htm(Accessed 15/07/09)
5. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet. 1991;337:867–872
   • Abstract
   • CrossRef
6. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. The Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097
   • CrossRef
7. In:  Deeks JJ,  Higgins JPT,  Altman DG,  Higgins JPT,  Green S editor. Analysing and presenting results. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6. Chichester: Wiley; 2006;[updated September 2006]; Section 8. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4