Surgery
Volume 27, Issue 9 , Pages 371-374, September 2009

Non-randomized and randomized trials

Jeremy Wright MBBS MBA FRCOG is a consultant gynaecologist at Ashford & St Peter's NHS Trust and Clinical Director of the MSc in Advanced Gynaecological Endoscopy at the Postgraduate Medical School, University of Surrey, UK. Conflicts of interest: none declared

Abstract 

Although good quality randomized controlled trials provide high level evidence for informing practice, they can be difficult to undertake within surgery. Non-randomized trials, whilst easier to conduct, often contain many biases that make it difficult to establish causation. It is no surprise, therefore, that much surgical practice is established through little evidence of efficacy, often being driven by external factors such as industry and personal preference. The ways in which surgical practice has evolved despite the evidence will be discussed. The difficulties of undertaking randomized and non-randomized trials will also be outlined.

Keywords: clinical trials, laparoscopy, non-randomized, randomized, randomized controlled trials

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0263-9319(09)00157-4

doi:10.1016/j.mpsur.2009.07.002

Surgery
Volume 27, Issue 9 , Pages 371-374, September 2009